Katarzyna Pikora
          Video games in education        
        
          17.06.2021   
          gaming, intellectual property        
                  
            Today, the benefits of using video games in education and training are no longer disputed. Simulation, sports, role-playing and strategy games help to improve eye–hand coordination, concentration and spatial orientation, exercise memory, develop perceptiveness, provoke logical thinking, and train users in making choices and decisions and foreseeing the consequences of their actions. Does this mean that teachers can use them in class without hesitation?          
               
      
          Use of an individual’s image in the media: A question of consent        
        
          10.10.2019   
          new technologies, intellectual property        
                  
            A person’s image, in the sense of a physical picture of an individual, is subject to protection as a personality right and as personal data. The rule under Art. 81 of the Polish Copyright Act is that a person whose image is fixed must consent to dissemination of the image. Fixation of an image includes capturing of the whole or part of a person’s profile, through any means—photo, film, drawing, painting, or portrait—enabling identification of the person. Dissemination of an image means any form of publication, i.e. making it accessible to an unlimited set of recipients, as in the case of media access. It is irrelevant whether use of the image is aimed at generating financial gain.          
               
      
          Liability of intermediaries for trademark infringement         
        
          21.03.2019   
          already in force, intellectual property        
                  
            The amendment to the Industrial Property Law in force since 16 March 2019 provides that a person whose services were used in an infringement is also liable for infringement of the protected right to a trademark. A trademark owner may demand that such a person refrain from infringing the trademark, turn over unjustly obtained benefits and repair the damage (where the infringement is culpable). Thus the new regulations introduce the intermediary’s own liability for trademark infringement.          
               
      
          Another step towards to EU copyright reform        
        
          27.09.2018   
          new provisions, intellectual property        
                  
            On 12 September 2018 the European Parliament approved a proposal for a copyright directive. For the directive to become law another vote has to be held, and this will be in 2019.          
               
      
          Proving the fame of a trademark for alcoholic beverages before the Polish courts         
        
          07.06.2018   
          intellectual property        
                  
            The fame or renown of a trademark is not a concept defined in Polish or EU law. The courts try to clarify this notion by pointing to the criteria that must be met for a mark to be regarded as renowned. Although these criteria are already well-established in the EU case law, the Polish courts sometimes add new requirements.          
               
      
          Protection of highly distinctive trademarks        
        
          15.10.2015   
          European Court of Justice, intellectual property        
                  
            Conceptual similarity between trademarks may be sufficient to find a risk of confusion even when there is little visual similarity between the marks, if the earlier mark has become highly distinctive through its use.          
               
      
          Gathering evidence of infringement        
        
          31.07.2014   
          intellectual property        
                  
            Businesses suspecting that their copyrights, trademarks, patents or industrial designs are being infringed by competitors often find it difficult to obtain evidence of the infringement sufficient to make a case in court. They are also concerned that if they wait until filing of the statement of claim to seek production of evidence, the defendant will have time to get rid of the evidence of the infringement.          
               
      
          Expensive apologies        
        
          24.07.2014   
          intellectual property        
                  
            A trademark infringer may be ordered not only to cease and desist, but also to pay damages and court costs and to bear the heavy expense of publishing the judgment and apologies.          
              